Log-rank test was used for comparison of time-to-event curves Un

Log-rank test was used for comparison of time-to-event curves. Univariate and find more multivariate

proportional hazards models were developed to examine predictors of pretransplant mortality. Time-to-event analyses were performed on HIV-infected haemophilic and non-haemophilic transplant recipients who died (time to death), who developed graft loss (time to graft loss), or who developed organ rejection (time to rejection). Time-to-event analyses were also performed on HIV-infected haemophilic and non-haemophilic transplant candidates who died pretransplant (time to death), who underwent transplantation (time to transplant), or who developed MELD score of 25, specifically, the time to MELD = 25 from the day of study enrolment, satisfying transplant and study eligibility criteria. Among those undergoing liver transplantation, the 1-year and Selleckchem RAD001 3-year survival and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Causes of pre and posttransplant deaths were determined, comparing co-infected haemophilic and non-haemophilic candidates. The statistical analysis was carried out using SAS version 9.2, Cary NC. All subjects provided signed informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol and informed consent documents were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each institution. Of 104 HIV-HCV

enrolled candidates, nearly one-third, 34 (32.7%), underwent liver transplantation, including 7 of 15 (46.7%) with haemophilia and 27 of 89 (30.3%) without haemophilia. At baseline, as compared with non-haemophilic transplant candidates, those with haemophilia were younger (P = 0.01) and men only (P = 0.02). When the analyses were rerun, using male-only controls, results MCE公司 were similar (data not shown). The two groups did not differ in BMI (P = 0.43), CD4 + count (P = 0.48), proportion with detectable HIV RNA (P = 0.70), or detectable HCV RNA (P = 0.36), Table 1. There were also no differences in socio-economic characteristics between groups. The median duration of HCV infection among haemophilic subjects,

based on exposure in the first year of life [17], was 40 years [IQR: 33–47], whereas the median duration of HCV infection among non-haemophilic subjects, based on a conservative assumption of exposure since 15 years of age, was 32 years [IQR: 29–37], P = 0.001. Comparing the haemophilic with non-haemophilic transplant recipients, there was no difference in the median time to transplantation, 0.15 years vs. 0.03 years, respectively (P = 0.15). There was also no difference in the proportion of recipients who died after transplantation, 4 of 7 (57.1%) in haemophilic subjects vs. 14 of 27 (51.8%) in non-haemophilic subjects, (Table 2), nor in the median time to posttransplant death, 1.29 years vs. 0.75 years respectively, P = 0.64 (Fig. 1a).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>