This prompts two questions: what is the sensitivity of a single NP swab and could this sensitivity be optimized by increasing the number of swabs Selleck Alisertib collected? The sensitivity of a single swab has been estimated using NP wash as a gold standard among healthy Kenyan children [15]. NP swabs had sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 73–95%) when both a swab and wash were collected in immediate sequence. In all children with a negative NP wash, the NP swab was also negative. Furthermore, two NP swabs (one swab passed into each nostril a few minutes apart) were found to be only marginally superior to a single NP swab. Taking the combined positive results of the two swabs as a reference gold

standard, the sensitivity of a single swab was 95% (95% CIs 88–98%). There was no evidence of a systematic advantage to swabbing either the right or left nostril [15]. Increasing the number of NP swabs taken at the same time-point does not increase the sensitivity appreciably, but increases the discomfort to the subject. Therefore, we recommend collecting a single NP swab to detect pneumococcal carriage. The study cited for this recommendation used culture-based detection and was confined to a single setting. Additional studies of multiple swabs would contribute meaningfully to the evidence for this recommendation if conducted among children in low prevalence

settings, among adults, and/or buy Bortezomib including molecular methods of detection. Ideally, NP swabs used for colonization studies should (1) be safe for use with minimal irritation or side effects, (2) be efficient at extracting micro-organisms from the nasopharynx onto the swab, (3) have no effect

on the viability of the isolated pneumococci or any other pathogens (viral or bacterial) to be assayed, (4) allow easy elution of organisms from the swab and (5) be compatible with all intended assays. For example, calcium alginate inhibits some real-time PCR assays resulting in a reduced sensitivity of detection of Bordetella pertussis [20], and natural fibers (e.g. cotton, rayon, or calcium alginate) often contain nucleic acids, which may be detected in whole microbiome sequencing studies (D. Bogaert, unpublished data) or may include Oxygenase inhibitors to pneumococcal growth (e.g. cotton). Materials that have been widely used in pneumococcal NP clinical studies include calcium alginate, rayon, Dacron and nylon flocked swabs. There are no clinical studies comparing the performance of these materials head-to-head, so any distinctions, if they exist, are inferred from studies of spiked samples and cross study clinical comparisons. Rayon, Dacron and calcium alginate swabs were compared for their ability to culture pneumococci directly from the swab or from the surrounding skim milk tryptone-glucose-glycerol (STGG) medium [21].