Some sources contain information on multiple fisheries in different jurisdictions, and may be cited multiple times. Not all fisheries have robust empirical data for analysis. Ribociclib supplier In data-poor fisheries, we have supplemented existing information with interviews with industry experts and government officials to provide a more robust estimate of the IU catches for the products concerned. In some cases, these sources provided information – sometimes including documentary information – of a non-public nature. A total of 41 interviews were conducted, of which 32 were confidential. While never preferred by researchers, the limited use of confidential information sources is accepted

practice in fisheries research. Even the most widely used data on wild fish catches, the data published biannually by the FAO, depends in part on expert opinions privately expressed to researchers. Under current circumstances, it is impossible to perform comprehensive and reliable research into IU fishing without including “leaked” confidential information. For this study, however, only a small fraction of the inputs underlying this study come from private, personal communications. These interviews

supplemented trade flow documents, furthered the understanding of trade flows, and aided in extrapolating the percentage of catches coming from different fleets, routes and countries in the re-reprocessed trade. In total, these TGF-beta activation sources offer an unprecedented examination of illegal and unreported fishing around the globe in 2011, allowing the production of the most accurate IU estimates to date. From each of the top 10 countries exporting to the U.S., the top 3 wild-caught products exported to the United States in 2011 (Table 2) comprised more than 0.5 million tonnes of seafood worth about US$ 3.7 billion. The results from this analysis of wild-caught imports (Table 3) indicate that 20–32% by weight of wild-caught seafood imported by the United States in 2011, with a value between $1.3 billion and $2.1

billion (or 15–26% of total value of wild-caught seafood), were from illegal and unreported C1GALT1 (IU) catches. This suggests that the amounts of illegal fish entering the market in the USA lie within the range of earlier estimates of global illegal fishing of 13–31% [24] implying that USA sourcing practices do not preclude entry of illegal products. Shrimps represented 24% of imports by volume and 31% by value in 2011. Although shrimps comprise the largest category of seafood imported to the USA both in volume and value, such products were excluded from the analysis for Thailand, China, Indonesia and Vietnam as much was of farmed origin. There is some evidence that wild-caught shrimp is on occasion illegally exported mislabeled as farmed shrimp and this issue is discussed in detail below.