Using +2 mV sample bias, the this website corresponding current map is displayed within Figure 2b. While the tubes give a constant current response along the entire length, the metal electrodes could not be observed in the current map. This is most probably due to an insulating layer formed at the corresponding surface as a result of residual photoresist [14]. Since a current

response along the CNTs could be observed, it can be assumed that the electrical contact is established between the CNTs and the two metal electrodes. This might be possible if the CNT/electrode contact is buried below this insulating layer, and therefore, a corresponding current response can be detected along the CNTs. Moreover, platinum (the coating material of the AFM SYN-117 in vitro probes) is well known JPH203 price to have a good adhesion to CNTs, and consequently, a good electric contact is expected. Figure 2 Topography (a) and current map (b) with +2 mV sample bias. The regions I, II, and III are discussed in the main text. For a better insight into the electric behavior of the CNTs, current–voltage spectroscopy was used. However, for a comprehensive study, the corresponding reproducibility of the I V

spectra has to be checked. Therefore, for the marked CNT (I), the same kind of AFM probes were used in successive working days. Multiple I V sets averaged over 10 spectra were recorded for the same location. One hundred points and 2-s acquisition time were used for each individual spectrum. Spectra (40, 60, and 120) were recorded using the tips #1, #2, and #3, respectively (see Table 1). The corresponding average spectra are displayed in Figure 3a. Regardless of the used AFM probe, the current–voltage

characteristics are highly reproducible. Between the two saturation regimes, which represent the current limitation of our device (±10 nA), a linear I V dependence was observed. This emphasizes a good Ohmic conduction at the CNT/metal interface. The values for the estimated resistance are included in Table 1, in good agreement with a previous transport study in the SWCNT networks [15]. It should be pointed out that these values contain a signature arising from multiple contacts namely, the AFM tip/CNT, CNT/metal electrode, and metal electrode/tungsten metallic wire (used to contact however the sample). Table 1 CNT resistance values estimated from CS-AFM   Tip #1 Tip #2 Tip #3 CNT I II III Resistance (kΩ) 85 96 103 349 2,630 Regions I, II, and II are shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 Current–voltage characteristics obtained. The same CNT (I) using different AFM probes (a); different CNTs using the same AFM probe (tip #3) (b). While the first and the last contributions are constant and negligible, the contact between the CNT and the metal electrode is of great importance. As can be observed from the bottom part of the topography image in Figure 2a, the contact (which equals the interface path between the CNTs and the metal surface) is different from bundle to bundle.