The aim of this observational study was to compare technical and clinical outcomes of a new construction technique for BBAVF (n-BBAVF) with that of the standard one-stage GSI-IX side-artery to end-vein transposed BBAVF (t-BBAVF). A n-BBAVF is constructed in the following way: basilic vein and brachial artery are isolated. Patency of the proximal and distal vein is verified by injecting warmed (37 degrees C) saline solution. A venotomy and an arterotomy of 4-5 mm are performed. The two vessels are prepared for a side-to-side

anastomosis without transposition of the vein. The latter allows both an antegrade and retrograde flow along the basilic vein, both proximally and distally to the anastomosis with more sites available for the venipunctures of the dialysis. Thirty BBAVFs were constructed as the secondary or tertiary vascular access in 30 patients over a 4-year period: 17 patients with adequate forearm basilic vein underwent the construction of a n-BBAVF; 13 underwent the construction of a t-BBAVF. The construction of a n-BBAVF requires a significantly lesser surgical time (55.0 +/- 9.0 minutes vs. 115.0 +/- 18.0, p < 0.0001), has fewer surgical complications (5.9% vs. 46.2%, p < 0.0001), and a reduced time to first use (24.5 +/- 6.3 vs. 37.7 +/- 9.1 days, p < 0.0001) than that of a t-BBAVF.

n-BBAVFs Selleckchem Small molecule library showed a relatively low rate of thrombosis per patient-year at risk (0.067 at 1 year and 0.099 at 2 years). The latter was significantly lower at 1 year when compared with t-BBAVFs (0.067 vs. 0.285; p < 0.004). Our policy of “all AVFs should be autogenous” led us to the construction of a vascular access which is based on a side-to-side anastomosis between the brachial artery and the basilic vein without transposition of the vein allowing both antegrade and retrograde

flow into the basilic vein. The results of this surgical technique appear satisfactory.”
“To perform esophageal reconstruction in patients after distal gastrectomy colonic or jejunal transplant is usually used. But the use of remnant stomach in esophagoplasty appears to selleck be an interesting idea. This method preserves some advantages of esophagogastroplasty as such. It is possible to pull-up the remnant stomach to the needed level, using mobilization with the spleen and pancreatic tail and its transposition into the left pleural cavity. This type of esophageal replacement, currently widely adopted in China, was proposed and first performed in 1958 by Professor A. A. Rusanov from Russia (former USSR). Different aspects of this method including historical are discussed in the literature review. (C) 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“BackgroundMegestrol acetate (MA) is an appetite stimulant with efficacy in promoting weight gain in adults with cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia.