A functional general stress response is probably needed in the manure-amended soil environment and nutrient availability is not the most limiting factor. This has also been shown for the plant pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas putida (Ramos-González & Molin, 1998). However, deletion and complementation studies should provide more evidence for the role of RpoS in the survival of E. coli O157 in manure-amended soil. In addition, the conditions for survival in non-amended soil might be completely different and the role of RpoS should be considered accordingly. Variation in
rpoS alleles has been observed among E. coli O157 isolates and it remains unclear which environment gives Copanlisib rise to and selects for rpoS mutants (Waterman & Small, 1996; Parker et al., 2012). None of the E. coli O157 strains isolated from the environment (from feral pig, river water, cow and pasture soil) and linked to the 2006 spinach-associated outbreak in the United
States showed mutations in the rpoS gene (Parker et al., 2012). In contrast, 3/3 clinical and 2/5 spinach isolates possessed mutations in the rpoS gene, produced signaling pathway lower levels of RpoS, showed decreased levels of rpoS-regulated genes, and showed impaired phenotypic resistance to low pH, osmotic stress and oxidative stress. Parker et al. (2012) suggested that bagged spinach could provide a niche for the rise and selection of rpoS mutants and that these mutants are merely maintained during passage through the human host. However, this suggestion is challenged by gene expression studies showing clear up-regulation of rpoS when associated with (injured) lettuce tissue, implying the need for a functional general stress response (Carey et al., 2009; Kyle et al., 2010; Fink et al., 2012). As the bovine intestine forms the principal reservoir of E. coli O157 and humans can be considered
a transient host with distinct gastrointestinal conditions, it DOCK10 was hypothesized that the human gut could provide a niche for the selection of rpoS mutants. Sequencing the structural part of the rpoS gene of 73 bovine, 29 food (23 meat, one lettuce and five endive isolates) revealed a skewed distribution of mutants among the different isolation sources. Bovine and food isolates had low numbers of mutants (0/73 and 2/29, respectively), while a relatively high number of mutants was observed among human isolates (28/85) (Table 2). A strong LSPA-6-specific distribution of rpoS(A543C) among the isolates was observed, with 100% of lineage I possessing rpoS(543A) whereas 100% of the lineage II strains had rpoS(543C). Lineage I/II were either rpoS(543A) or rpoS(543C): bovine strains, 44.8% rpoS(543A) and 55.2% rpoS(543C); food strains, 26.7% rpoS(543A) and 73.3% rpoS(543C); human clinical strains, 49.2% rpoS(543A) and 50.8% rpoS(543C). This is in agreement with earlier findings that lineage I/II is genetically more diverse than lineage I and II (Bono et al., 2012; Eppinger et al., 2012).