Certain environmental factors warrant consideration ( Cavill and Watkins, 2007++; Lawrence et al., 2009+; Parry et al., 2007+; Peerbhoy et al., 2008+). Perceived lack of local shopping amenities and accessing shops with children could Rho kinase activity be prohibitive to healthy eating. Fear of crime, intimidation and attack, dark evenings

and poor weather were barriers to outdoor physical activity. Social norms, preferences, habitual behaviours and lifestyle were also found to be influential ( Daborn et al., 2005++; Dibsdall et al., 2002++; Gough and Conner, 2006++; Gray et al., 2009+; Kennedy et al., 1998+; Lawrence et al., 2009+; Peerbhoy et al., 2008+; Stead et al., 2004+; Whelan et al., 2002+; Withall et al., 2009+; Wood et al., 2010+; Wormald et al., 2006+). Barriers to healthy eating included perceiving ‘bad’ foods as a treat and ‘good’ foods as boring and unsatisfying, prioritising traditional food and family preferences over healthy choices, perceived lack of family support in childhood, parental influence, habit in unhealthy shopping and eating and living alone. Women’s eating practices were often influenced by a perceived lack of personal control and importance. Men’s barriers centred Nutlin 3 on personal preferences (to be overweight

rather than ‘thin’), personal choice and good current health. Facilitators included women’s motivation to cook healthy food for their children and men’s motivation to engage in ‘masculine’ physical activity to compensate

for an unhealthy diet. To better understand the relationship between interventions and barriers and facilitators, we juxtaposed quantitative and qualitative data. Specifically, we examined which barriers and facilitators were addressed in any intervention and in effective interventions specifically (Table 1; Supplementary Table 8). Fifteen facilitators and 24 barriers were covered by the interventions and 17 facilitators and 24 barriers were not, suggesting that while the interventions reviewed should have a moderate degree of acceptability, there is scope for interventions Histamine H2 receptor to be more sensitive to the needs of low-SES groups. The five studies, to find at least one positive effect of the intervention, addressed some of the barriers and facilitators identified in the qualitative studies (of the 15 facilitators and 24 barriers covered by interventions, six facilitators and 11 barriers were covered by ‘effective’ interventions; Supplementary Table 8). The barriers and facilitators covered by ‘effective’ interventions encompassed a range of psychological and pragmatic considerations, although some more deeply-ingrained psychological and pragmatic considerations, such as attitudes and perceptions relating to health behaviour and weight and fear of crime were not addressed by the interventions reviewed.