coli obtained from blood, stool and urine obtained from hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients seeking

treatment in Kenyan hospitals during an 18-year period (1992 to 2010). Results Phenotypic diversity of β-lactamase-producers None of the 912 isolates tested in this study were resistant to TH-302 supplier carbapenems. Cefepime, (a fourth generation cephalosporin), cefoxitin (a cephamycin), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), were effective against majority (60%) of these isolates. The NSBL-like phenotype was the most dominant phenotype in our collection and was observed in 278 (30%) of the 912 isolates compared to 73 (8%), 247 (27%), 220 (24%) and 94 (10%) of isolates found to exhibit IRT-, ESBL-, CMT and pAmpC-like phenotypes respectively, Buparlisib Table 1. Based on resistance phenotypes, 247 ESBL-producers fit into two sets. The first set comprised of 142 isolates exhibiting resistance Selleckchem CB-5083 to combinations of aztreonam and

multiple cephalosporins including ceftazidime. The other set of 105 isolates were resistant to the same panel of antibiotics but not to ceftazidime. The 220 isolates with a CMT-like phenotype were resistant to all generations of cephalosporins but were susceptible to cephamycins and carbapenems. Resistance to all β-lactamase inhibitors including TZP was observed in 160 (73%) of the CMT-producers. Among 40 isolates with a CMT-like phenotype that had intermediate resistance to TZP, tiny ghost zones (≤ 3 mm) were observed between amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) and ceftazidime (CAZ) and/or Cefotaxime (CTX). These isolates therefore exhibited a combination of both ESBL- and CMT-like phenotypes. The most resistant strains were those exhibiting a pAmpC-like phenotype. These 94 isolates comprising about 10% of all the isolates in our collection were resistant to most generations of cephalosporins and β-lactamase inhibitors including TZP but were susceptible to carbapenems. Table 1 β-lactamase phenotypes encountered eltoprazine among the 912 strains analyzed Antibiotics

to which isolates were resistant Penicillins, 1st & 2nd generation cephalosporins 3rd Generation cephalosporins & Monobactams 4th Generation cephalosporins inhibitors Cephamycins Most probable Phenotypea Total (%)n = 912 AMP, KF, AMX − − − − NSBL 103 (11) AMP, AMX, KF OXA − − − − NSBL 175 (19) AMP, AMX, KF OXA − − AMC, AMS − IRT 65 (7) AMP, KF, AMX, − − AMC, AMS − IRT 8 (1) AMP, AMX, KF, CXM CTXb, AZTb − − − ESBL 105 (12) AMP, AMX , KF, CXM CTX, CAZ*, AZT − − − ESBL 75 (8) AMP, AMX, OXA KF, CXM CTXb, CAZb, AZT FEP AMS − ESBL 67 (7) AMP, AMX, OXA KF, CXM CTX, CAZ*, AZT FEP AMC, AMS − CMT 40 (4) AMP, AMX, OXA, KF, CXM CTX, CAZ, AZT FEP AMC, AMS, TZP − CMT 180 (20) AMP, AMX, OXA KF, CXM CTX, CAZ, AZT FEP AMC, AMS, TZP FOX pAmpC 94 (10) Resistance phenotypes of the 912 isolates investigated.