Covariates examined were HLA-antibody at entry, rejection, gender, re-transplantation, and delayed graft function. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI. Sixty-five patients had pre-transplant HLA-antibody: DSA group n = 37 (14%) and Non-DSA group n = 28 (11%) while the remaining 193 (75%) patients had no HLA antibody defined using the MFI cut-off of < 500 or with a negative antibody screen. Baseline clinical and demographic data of these groups is reported in detail elsewhere and summarised in Table 1. [27]As expected, patients with any HLA antibody were more commonly female

(41/65 vs 53/193 p = 0.003) and more likely to have undergone prior kidney transplant (20/65 vs 7/193 p < 0.001) and to have received Pre-RBCT (39/65 vs 70/193 P = 0.011). There was no difference in haemoglobin between the groups either selleck products at time of transplant (DSA 124 ± 19, Non-DSA 124 ± 18, No-Antibody 124 ± 15 g/L p = 0.99) or at 30 days post transplant (DSA 109 ± 17, Non-DSA 113 ± 13, No-Antibody 114 ± 17 g/L p = 0.19). Patients

with pre-transplant DSA were significantly more likely to have been transfused within the first 30 peri-operative days (DSA 70%) than those with Non-DSA (43%) or no HLA antibody (38% p < 0.001) although Epacadostat mw the amount of RBCT was not different [DSA 4 (2–4), Non-DSA 2 (2–4) and No-Antibody 2 (2–4) units median and IQR p = 0.17] and > 90% of all post-transplant RBCT given within the first 2 peri-operative days. In order to explore further the relationship between transfusion and pre-transplant DSA we divided the patients into four groups according to their transfusion status — No-RBCT, Pre-RBCT, Post-RBCT and Pre + Post-RBCT groups as previously defined (Table 2). Overall 109/258 (42%) received Pre-RBCT and 111/258 (43%) of patients received Post-RBCT. The prevalence of HLA antibody amongst these groups Dynein varied significantly as expected. The No-RBCT group were much

more likely to have no HLA antibody (86%) than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conversely however, the Pre + Post-RBCT group were more likely to have DSA (p < 0.05), receive a repeat transplant and less likely to receive a pre-emptive or living donor transplant, although time on dialysis was similar to those with Pre- and Post-RBCT. Patients with Pre-RBCT only were significantly less likely to have Non-AMR rejection than all other groups (p < 0.05 Table 3). Patients in the Pre + Post-RBCT group were more likely to have DGF than all other groups, and had a 4 fold increased risk of AMR (Table 3 and Fig. 1 p = 0.004) with a median time to AMR of 2 months. Given the association of Pre + Post RBCT with AMR we next examined the importance of pre-transplant DSA, a known risk for AMR, in the various transfusion groups.