Hence, cefazolin may be selleckchem readily inactivated by the respective lactamases produced by these isolates. All other isolates showed fluorescence profiles similar

to #2. Although, ideally #2 should not exhibit fluorescence change over time, a slight increase was noted (Figure 2). A range of mean ±3X standard deviation observed for #2 (β-LEAF only reaction) would give 99.7% confidence intervals for values by Gaussian STI571 nmr statistics. The upper limit of this range, i.e. mean + 3X standard deviation was set up as a cut-off value (Figure 2). Isolates showing cleavage rates within this cut-off, that is, low/negligible increase in fluorescence of β-LEAF with time similar to non-producer #2, were designated as non-producers of β-lactamase. Also as negligible differences between the cleavage rates of β-LEAF and β-LEAF + cefazolin reactions were observed, cefazolin was predicted to be

active to treat infections caused by these bacteria. Isolates that showed cleavage rate of β-LEAF alone higher than the cut-off included those observed to cleave β-LEAF efficiently (#6, #18, #19 and #20), as well as some isolates showing marginal differences from #2, such as #22. These could be low producers. As the difference CDK and cancer in cleavage rates in the absence and presence of cefazolin was minimal in these marginal cases, cefazolin was predicted as active. The results of the β-LEAF assay for all isolates are summarized in Table 2

(column 2 and column 6). Table 2 Comparison of different methods of β-lactamase detection and cefazolin antibiotic susceptibility/activity determination S. aureus isolate # β-LACTAMSE GENOTYPE (‘blaZ’ PCR) β-LACTAMASE PHENOTYPE CEFAZOLIN SUSCEPTIBILITY/ACTIVITY     β-LEAF assay* Nitrocefin disk test Zone edge test Disk diffusion Antibiotic activity – β-LEAF assay**   ‘+’ = positive PCR   Uniform orange color = ‘+’ (positive) Sharp zone edge = ‘+’ (positive) S = susceptible LA = less active   $: contained stop codon or deletion       (!) = sharp zone edge A = active 1 + + + + S (!) LA 2 – - – - S A 3 + – - – S A 4 – - – - S A 5 + – - – S A 6 + + + + S (!) LA 7 + – - – S A 8 + – - – S A 9 + – - – S A 10 +$ – - – S A 11 + – - – S A 12 + – - – S A 13 + – - – S A 14 + – - – S A 15 + – - – S A 16 +$ – - – S A 17 +$ – - – S A 18 + + + Anidulafungin (LY303366) + S (!) LA 19 + + + + S (!) LA 20 + + + + S (!) LA 21 – - – - S A 22 + (Weak) + – - S A 23 – - – - S A 24 Unknown – - – S A 25 – - – - S A 26 + – - – S A 27 + – - – S A   Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 $Special comment – blaZ contained Stop codon or deletion (so non-functional) (Robert L. Skov, unpublished results). *Classification into positive and negative is based on proposed cut-off depicted in Figure 2 (upper limit of mean ± 3X Std. deviation for strain #2, β-LEAF probe reaction) to demarcate β-lactamase production.