Since EMs are non-decomposable, removing one of the reactions fr

Since EMs are non-decomposable, removing one of the reactions from these EM will prevent the system from producing E and subsequently

achieving the PSynth. There are six EMs in total, of which five lead to the formation of metabolite X and the objective reaction. (2) Determine how to prevent PSynth from taking place, i.e. stop the five EMs that involve PSynth from being functional. This can be done in various ways e.g. inactivating one or more reactions in the EMs by deleting genes of certain enzymes or other manipulations that inhibit the enzymes. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Different numbers and combination of reactions can be removed to eliminate PSynth. The MCSs for a given objective reaction in a large metabolic network, however, cannot be done by a simple examination; an algorithm would be needed to compute the MCSs. The first algorithm was developed by Klamt Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and Gilles [12] although others have been developed since, to improve on the computational speed and efficiency; these

are discussed in Section 3.2. The MCS Algorithm The MCS algorithm devised by Klamt and Gilles [12] relies on the fact that: any feasible steady-state flux distribution Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in a given network, expressed by a vector of the net reaction rates, r, can be represented by a non-negative linear combination of elementary modes as illustrated in Equation 1 (adapted from [11]): (1) where N is the number of EMs; and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the selleck products removal of reactions from the network results in a new set of EMs constituted by those EMs from the

original network that do not involve the deleted reactions [24]. Before MCSs are computed, the set of EMs is split into two disjoint sets: the set of target modes (Et), i.e., all EMs (et,j) involving the objective reaction, t the set of non-target modes (Ent), i.e., EMs not involving the objective reaction, nt (2) The right-hand side of Equation 2 above, illustrates, respectively, the set of EMs (e,t,j) comprising the target Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical modes (Et) and the set of EMs (ent,k) comprising the non-target modes (Ent) [11]. Since removing a set of MCSs ensures inactivation of all target modes Et,j, only non-target modes Ent,k could survive, which means that all remaining flux distributions r will show zero flux in the objective reaction, robjR. The pseudocode of the MCS algorithm for calculating Brefeldin_A MCSs initially developed by S. Klamt and E.D. Gilles is provided in [12] and further modified for the example network, NetEx, discussed in [11]. For the NetEx network, the algorithm calculates seven MCSs in addition to the trivial MCS (PSynth itself). To illustrate, one of the MCSs (MCS2) is shown in Figure 7 below: Figure 7 One of the Minimal cut sets (MCSs) for objective reaction PSynth: The simultaneous blocking of reactions R1 and R7 will eliminate PSynth and block the production of P. The seven MCSs and the corresponding EMs are shown in the first two tables of Table 1. 2.5. Generalized Concept of MCSs S.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>