This effect seems related to a rapid and efficient adjustment to the ongoing task requirements and therefore

needs more time to develop and takes place right before the stimulus onset. According to this model, we found the typical SME topography in the stay condition reaching its peak shortly after the presentation of the repeated cue (in the time window from −2 to −1 sec). In addition, we also expected that this topography would extend across the entire epoch, that is, in both Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical time windows. However, this was not the case. Presumably, the influence of sustained processes on the prestimulus SME in the window preceding the stimulus onset (from −1 to 0 sec) is present but too subtle to be detected, because attenuated by the predominant ongoing parallel activation of the transient activity related to the switch trials, reaching its peak in this time window. In line with this interpretation, the topographic analyses yielded on a global level a stronger effect Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in the switch condition compared to the effect found in the stay condition;

this result is in line with the knowledge that transient reconfiguration processes related to task switching recruit more attentional resources Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical than do sustained attentional processes. The engagement of an higher amount of attentional resources reflects increased demand for cognitive control (Braver et al. 2003), which on a performance level, translates into a need for more time and effort for task execution (Meiran et al. 2000; Corbetta and Shulman 2002; Monsell 2003). Coherently,

we find at study longer RTs for switch click here versus stay trials, revealing a behavioral cost due to additional Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical computations required for task switching. At test, we observed that slightly more words were recognized in switch than in stay trials, although there was no statistical difference between the two conditions. As previously suggested by Reynolds et al. (2004), such increased demands might be required not only for task switching, but also for maintenance of both task representations in accessible states Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical across trials, together with the additional need to favor and consequently react GPX6 to the appropriate one. In fact in the same study, the additional attentional load provoked by a task switch setting, similar to the one used in our study, showed poststimulus effects both at a behavioral and neural level, resembling our findings. At study, the behavioral performance was characterized by slower RTs and lower accuracy in the task switching condition. At test, they found that fewer words were recognized in the task switching condition than in the stay condition. On a neural level, Reynolds et al. (2004) showed a higher activation in the prefrontal cortex for switch versus stay conditions. Interestingly, in a previous study based on the same data set, Braver et al.