We subsequently developed a paper-based survey for pharmacy-based EC consumers to complete. The survey was reviewed for face and content validity by an expert panel of practising community pharmacists (n = 3), pharmacy academic and researchers
(n = 5) and a sexual health physician (n = 1). It was pilot tested on six female pharmacy students. The final survey was designed as a six-sided leaflet. All the details about the study, the participants’ voluntary involvement and an understanding that completion of the survey was taken as informed consent were clearly stated on the front cover of the leaflet. The first section focused on demographic and risk factors for chlamydia. There were free-text Regorafenib concentration questions (for current age, post code and age at first intercourse) and tick-box questions for all other information. The second section of the survey evaluated their pharmacy experience during the EC consultation. These questions were presented as five-point Likert-type responses (with a central neutral response). The third section contained some facts about chlamydia
followed by a final polar yes/no question on whether they would accept a chlamydia test from the pharmacy. An invitation to participate, together with the pharmacy participation consent form, was sent to all registered pharmacies in Western Australia (WA): the Perth metropolitan region (n = 401) and rural, regional and remote WA (n = 112). Pharmacies that expressed this website an interest, had a private consultation/screened area and conducted an average of eight or more EC requests per month were recruited. Pharmacists at these participating pharmacies were requested to issue the survey to all women after their EC consultation during the data-collection
period. Participation was voluntary and the pharmacist had been instructed not to assist them in filling in the survey. Women were encouraged to complete the survey, seal it in the paid envelope provided and leave it in the pharmacy. They also had the option of taking the survey home to complete at a more convenient time and post it directly to the research team. Pharmacies in the Perth metropolitan region distributed the survey to women requesting EC over a 6-week period between April and May 2009, while pharmacist in rural, regional and remote WA distributed the survey over a 6-month period between September Acyl CoA dehydrogenase 2009 and February 2010. Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysed using SPSS Statistics 20. Descriptive statistics were performed on all data. All continuous variables were analysed for normality and are reported as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data, and median (interquartile range; IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Comparison between all categorical variables was conducted using Pearson’s chi-square test. Significance was set at the 5% level. We found no clear definition of ‘inconsistent barrier contraception’ in the literature, so we created our own.